Abstract: In recent years, there has been a rise of provincial rights narratives in various regions of the country. At the same time, perhaps more so than in the past, settler Canadians and governments are attuned to the moral authority of Indigenous rights narratives. This volume considers how principles of federalism are reflected and refracted, in the light of these two dynamics, both of which are unfolding in an era of unprecedented social policy expansion. It seeks to explore how these two discourses and movements interact: are there instances where one serves as a counterpoint to the other? How are they possibly complementary? How have they affected social policy expansion?
There are a total of 3 roundtables
Roundtable 3: Institutional Stretching
How are the institutions to manage the operation of federal principles in Canada (eg. The courts; executive federalism) being called to adapt, or being utilized by Indigenous rights and provincial rights asserters and defenders in Canada? If we take as a starting point, that institutions are not “neutral vessels” for the argument of points of rights and points of view, but rather, imbued with certain understandings about whose voices are legitimate in the first place, what is the way forward for these institutions in the functioning of the federation?
Contributions include activity of the Supreme Court and Section 33, the Council of the Federation, or executive federalism more generally and the role of Indigenous peoples within or apart from it.