Atelier 3 - Sécurité nationale et renseignement : perspectives canadiennes et comparées



W318 - National Security & Intelligence: Plenary Session on Foreign Interference

Date: Jun 14 | Heure: 12:00pm to 01:30pm | Salle: McGill College 2001 461

Chair/Président/Présidente : Christian Leuprecht (Royal Military College & Queen's University)

Discussant/Commentateur/Commentatrice : Benjamin Fung (McGill University)


THIS IS A CPSA OPEN EVENT (see list of 2024 Open Events) COMMUNITY PASS REQUIRED (Read more HERE) | ÉVÉNEMENT ORGANISÉ PAR L’ACSP OUVERT AU PUBLIC (Regardez ICI la liste des événements) LAISSEZ-PASSER COMMUNAUTAIRE OBLIGATOIRE (Cliquez ICI pour en savoir plus)
As an advanced economy and open democracy, Canada is a frequent target of foreign interference. Foreign interference includes harmful activities undertaken by foreign states, or those acting on their behalf, that are clandestine, deceptive, or involve a threat to any person to advance the strategic objectives of those states to the detriment of Canada’s national interests. Foreign interference poses a strategic threat to Canada’s national security. A Member of Parliament, a professor, and two investigative journalists discuss threats, harassment or intimidation by foreign state and non-state actors who target officials at all levels of government to influence public policy and decision-making in a way that is clandestine, deceptive or threatening.Foreign governments have legal, established, and legitimate channels of engagement with the Government of Canada. However, some foreign governments cross the line from standard diplomacy and lobbying into foreign interference when they seek to exert influence in non-transparent ways. Foreign interference poses one of the greatest strategic threats to Canada’s national security. Examples include: • Threats, harassment or intimidation by foreign states, or those acting on its behalf, against anyone in Canada, Canadian communities, or their loved ones abroad; and, • Targeting officials at all levels of government to influence public policy and decision-making in a way that is clandestine, deceptive or threatening. These activities can have serious implications for Canadian interests, national security and democratic processes and institutions. While Canada has a number of existing tools to support transparency, new measures could be considered, such as a foreign influence transparency registry, which would better align Canada’s approach with those of like-minded partners and allies, bolstering overall collective resilience.

Participants:
Michael Chong (Member of Parliament)
Sam Cooper (The Bureau)
Sarah-Maude Lefebvre (Journal de Montréal)